Pseudoscience, Cross-examination, and Scientific Evidence in the Recovered Memory Controversy
Edit Page
Report
Scan day: 15 February 2014 UTC
-344
Virus safety - good
Description: A white paper from the American Psychological Association journal "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law", examining the concept of recovered memories from a research perspective.
Pseudoscience, Cross-examination, and Scientific Evidence in the Recovered The Recovered Memory Controversy » recovered memory controversy Pseudoscience, Cross-examination, and Scientific Evidence in the Recovered Memory Controversy
Size: 233 chars
Contact Information
Email:Send Message
Phone&Fax: —
Address: —
Extended: —
WEBSITE Info
| Page title: | Pseudoscience, Cross-examination, and Scientific Evidence in the Recovered |
| Keywords: | |
| Description: | The recovered memory controversy is a mix of conflicting claims, theories, and research. This article suggests using 6 basic sets of cross-examination questions to assess the material in this area and to expose pseudoscience. |
| IP-address: | 216.194.161.236 |
WHOIS Info
| NS | Name Server: NS.INMOTIONHOSTING.COM Name Server: NS2.INMOTIONHOSTING.COM |
| WHOIS | Status: clientDeleteProhibited Status: clientRenewProhibited Status: clientTransferProhibited Status: clientUpdateProhibited |
| Date | Creation Date: 03-apr-2000 Expiration Date: 03-apr-2021 |