MainScienceSocial SciencesPsychology › The Darwin Debate

The Darwin Debate

Edit Page
Report
Scan day: 05 March 2014 UTC
17
Virus safety - good
Description: This essay appeared in Marxism Today 26 (no.4), April 1982, pp. 20-22.
1982 was the centenary of Darwin's death, and everyone was (as they still are) claiming his legacy as the foundation of their particular world view. Marxists are particularly prone to do this, since there is a tradition of 'Scientific Marxism' stemming from the Second International to which the orthodox adhere, and Marx and Engels had a lot to say about Darwinism. I took this opportunity to write in a Communist Party periodical to say, somewhat mischievously, that socialists might have just as much in common with religious fundamentalists as they do with reductionist scientists, in that socialists are not wedded to fatalism in human affairs, something the religious claim, too. I also tried to show that there are a number of facets to the debate about humanity's place in nature and that one has to keep one's wits about one and not merely defer to scientists. The essay appeared in
Size: 916 chars

Contact Information

Phone&Fax:
Address:
Extended:

WEBSITE Info

Page title:The Darwin Debate
Keywords:Robert M. Young, Darwin, centenary, debate
Description:1982 was the centenary of Darwin's death, and everyone was (as they still are) claiming his legacy as the foundation of their particular world view. Marxists are particularly prone to do this, since there is a tradition of 'Scientific Marxism' stemming from the Second International to which the orthodox adhere, and Marx and Engels had a lot to say about Darwinism. I took this opportunity to write in a Communist Party periodical to say, somewhat mischievously, that socialists might have just as much in common with religious fundamentalists as they do with reductionist scientists, in that socialists are not wedded to fatalism in human affairs, something the religious claim, too. I also tried to show that there are a number of facets to the debate about humanity's place in nature and that one has to keep one's wits about one and not merely defer to scientists. The essay appeared in Marxism Today 26 (no.4), April 1982, pp. 20-22.
IP-address:65.254.250.152

WHOIS Info

NS
Name Server: NS2.POWWEB.COM
Name Server: NS3.POWWEB.COM
WHOIS
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Date
Creation Date: 11-jul-1996
Expiration Date: 10-jul-2014