A Reply to Some Arguments against Esperanto
Edit Page
Report
Scan day: 05 March 2014 UTC
-21
Virus safety - good
Description: Arguments in defense of Esperanto by Sybil and Don Harlow.
A reply to some arguments against Esperanto A reply to some arguments against Esperanto People use Esperanto to talk to each other, make love, argue politics, write poetry (both good and bad), write novels (allegories, thrillers, science-fiction...), write scientific papers, do their jobs, etc., etc., etc -- in short, to communicate with other people under all possible circumstances. To me, this means that it's a real language. You may exclude it from this category, if you wish, by redefining the term "real language", but this is a trivial way of getting rid of it, and would be an indication more of meanness of spirit than of any problem with the language.
Size: 679 chars
Contact Information
Email:Send Message
Phone&Fax: —
Address: —
Extended: —
WEBSITE Info
| Page title: | A reply to some arguments against Esperanto |
| Keywords: | |
| Description: | |
| IP-address: | 64.13.153.237 |
WHOIS Info
| NS | Name Server:NS2.WESTERNWEB.COM Name Server:NS1.WESTERNWEB.COM Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: Name Server: |
| WHOIS | Status: clientTransferProhibited |
| Date | Creation Date: 1997-03-26T05:00:00Z Expiry Date: 2016-03-27T05:00:00Z |