Is the ISO Prolog standard taken seriously
Edit Page
Report
Scan day: 07 February 2014 UTC
-7
Virus safety - good
Description: article by Roberto Bagnara.
Is the ISO Prolog standard taken seriously? Is the ISO Prolog standard taken seriously? Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica During the development of a CLP multi-language software tool I discovered that the ISO Prolog standard is essentially disregarded. This happens even for the most widespread and influential Prolog/CLP implementations, even in their most recent versions, and even if we look at syntax only. For instance, let us take X-Prolog to range over "SICStus Prolog 3.7.1", "SWI-Prolog 2.8.1", "BinProlog 5.75", "you name it". Then it appears that:
Size: 605 chars
Contact Information
Email:Send Message
Phone&Fax: —
Address: —
Extended: —
WEBSITE Info
| Page title: | Is the ISO Prolog standard taken seriously? |
| Keywords: | |
| Description: | |
| IP-address: | 160.78.167.140 |
WHOIS Info
| NS | |
| WHOIS | Status: ok / autoRenewPeriod |
| Date | Created: 1996-01-29 00:00:00 Created: 2007-03-01 10:35:26 Created: 1993-07-29 00:00:00 Created: 1998-09-21 00:00:00 Created: 1993-07-29 00:00:00 Created: 1998-09-21 00:00:00 Created: 1998-09-21 00:00:00 Last Update: 2014-01-30 00:38:21 |